Graph Theory I - Hoang Anh Duc - MIM - HUS - VNU

Graph Theory II - Hoang Anh Duc - MIM - HUS - VNU

Work 15 (I).

Prove that if GG is a simple undirected graph with exactly 2 vertices u,vu, v with odd degree then these vertices belongs to a single connected component of GG.

Solution:

  • Vertices with odd degree: By the handshaking lemma, the number of vertices with odd degrees must be even. Given GG has exactly two vertices uu and vv with odd degrees, there can be no other vertices in GG with odd degree.
  • Structure of GG: If uu and vv does not belong to the same connected component. then uu and vv would lie in different connected components of GG.
    • Consider the connected component C1C_1 containing uu. Since uu has an odd degree, the sum of degress of all vertices in C1C_1 would be odd, violating the handshaking lemma (as the sum of all degrees in any graph or subgraph must be even).
    • Similarly, the connected component C2C_2 containing vv would also have an odd degree sum, which again violates the handshaking lemma.
  • The contradiction implies that uu and vv cannot lie in separate connected components. Therefore, uu and vv must belong to the same connected component.

Work 20 (I).

Prove that:

(1)κ(G)minvVdegG(v)(2)λ(G)minvVdegG(v)\begin{align} & (1) \quad \kappa(G) \leq \min_{v \in V} \deg_G(v) \quad \\[5pt] & (2) \quad \lambda(G) \leq \min_{v \in V} \deg_G(v) \quad \end{align}

Are true for all undirected connected graph G=(V,E)G = (V, E).

Solution:

(1):

  • Consider the minimum degree of a vertex in GG, denoted as δ(G)=minvVdegG(v)\delta(G) = \min_{v \in V} \deg_G(v).
  • Removing a vertex vv disconnects it from its neighbors. Since vv has exactly degG(v)\deg_G(v) neighbors, at most degG(v)\deg_G(v) vertices are directly affected when vv is removed.
  • The vertex connectivity κ(G)\kappa (G) cannot exceed δ(G)\delta (G), because the removal of any single vertex affects at most degg(v)\deg_g(v) vertices.
  • Therefore: κ(G)minvVdegG(v)\kappa(G) \leq \min_{v \in V} \deg_G(v).

(2):

  • Removing all edges incident to a vertex vv will isolate vv from the rest of the graph. The number of edges incident to vv is degG(v)\deg_G (v).
  • The edge connectivity λ(G)\lambda (G) is the minimum of edges required to disconnect GG. Clearly, λ(G)\lambda(G) cannot exceed δ(G)\delta (G), because disconnecting GG by removing edges must involve at least as many edges as are incident to the vertex with the smallest degree.
  • Therefore: λ(G)minvVdegG(v)\lambda(G) \leq \min_{v \in V} \deg_G(v).

Work 21 (I).

Find κ(G)\kappa(G), λ(G)\lambda(G) and minvVdeg(v)\min_{v \in V} \deg(v) for:

graphs

Solution:

  • Graph (1)
    • κ(G)=2\kappa(G) = 2.
    • λ(G)=2\lambda(G) = 2.
    • minvVdeg(v)=2\min_{v \in V} \deg(v) = 2.
  • Graph (2)
    • κ(G)=3\kappa(G) = 3.
    • λ(G)=3\lambda(G) = 3.
    • minvVdeg(v)=3\min_{v \in V} \deg(v) = 3.

Work 24 (I).

Find the number of paths with length nn between two distinct vertices of K4K_4 with nn being 2, 3, 4 and 5.

Solution: 2, 6, 14, 36.

Work 2 (II).

With what value of nn does the graphs KnK_n, CnC_n, WnW_n and QnQ_n has an Eulerian circuit.

Solution:

  • KnK_n: nn is odd.
  • CnC_n: n3n \geq 3.
  • WnW_n: nn is even.
  • QnQ_n: nn is even.

Work 4 (II).

Find an Eulerian path/circuit in these graphs if any.

graphs

Solution:

  • Graph (1)
    • Degrees for a, b, c, d, e: 3, 2, 3, 2, 2.
    • Odd vertices: a and c.
    • EP: Exists.
    • EC: None.
  • Graph (2)
    • Degrees for a, b, c, d, e: 2, 3, 3, 2, 4.
    • Odd vertices: b and c.
    • EP: Exists.
    • EC: None.
  • Graph (3)
    • Degrees for a, b, c, d, e, f: 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4.
    • Odd vertices: None
    • EP: Exists.
    • EC: Exists.

Work 6 (II).

Give a graph where it’s Eulerian circuit is also a Hamilton circuit.

Solution: C3C_3

Work 7 (II).

Which of the following graphs has a Hamilton circuit and why.

graphs

Solution:

  • Graph (1)
    • HC: Exists: a -> b -> e -> d -> c -> a.
  • Graph (2)
    • HC: None.
  • Graph (3)
    • HC: Exists: a -> e -> c -> d -> b -> f -> a.