MAT3500 - Induction and Recursion Assignment - Part 1
Sept. 29th 2024
17
Min.
Assignment on Induction and Recursion (Part 1 - Induction)
Induction and Recursion - Hoang Anh Duc - HUS - VNU
Work 2.
- (1) Prove the following propositions using mathematical induction
Block
- Base case:
Block
- Inductive step: Assume
- That is:
- We need to prove:
- Which is: (inductive hypothesis)
\begin{flalign*} &\left(\frac{k(k+1)}{2}\right)^2 + (k+1)^3 \quad \\[5pt] = &\frac{(k(k+1))^2}{4} + \frac{4(k+1)^3}{4} \quad \\[5pt] = &\frac{(k(k+1))^2+4(k+1)^3}{4} \quad \\[5pt] = &(k+1)^2\left(\frac{k^2+4k+4}{4}\right) \quad \\[5pt] = &\left(\frac{(k+1)(k+2)}{4}\right)^2 \end{flalign*}Block
- So
- By induction,
- (2) Prove the following propositions using mathematical induction
Block
- Base case:
\begin{flalign*} LHS&=(2\cdot 0+1)^2=1 \\[10pt] RHS&=\frac{(0+1)(2\cdot 0+1)(2\cdot 0+3)}{3} \quad \\[10pt] &=\frac{1\cdot 1\cdot 3}{3}=1 \quad \\[10pt] &\rightarrow P(0) = \mathbf{T} \end{flalign*}Block
- Inductive step: Assume
- That is:
- We need to prove:
- Which is:
\begin{flalign*} & 1^2 + 3^2 + 5^2 + \ldots + (2k+1)^2 + (2(k+1)+1)^2 \quad \\[8pt] &= \frac{(k+1)(2k+1)(2k+3)}{3} + (2(k+1)+1)^2 \quad \\[8pt] &\text{(By the inductive hypothesis)} \end{flalign*}Block
- We have:
\begin{flalign*} &\frac{(k+1)(2k+1)(2k+3)}{3} + (2(k+1)+1)^2 \quad \\[5pt] = &\frac{(k+1)(2k+1)(2k+3) + 3(2k+3)^2}{3} \quad \\[5pt] = &\frac{(2k+3)\left[(k+1)(2k+1)+3(2k+3)\right]}{3} \quad \\[5pt] = &\frac{(2k+3)\left[2k^2+3k+1+6k+9\right]}{3} \quad \\[5pt] = &\frac{(2k+3)\left[2k^2+9k+10\right]}{3} \quad \\[5pt] = &\frac{(2k+3)\left[2k^2+5k+4k+10\right]}{3} \quad \\[5pt] = &\frac{(2k+3)(k+2)(2k+5)}{3} \quad \\[5pt] \end{flalign*}Block
- So
- By induction,
- (3) Prove the following propositions using mathematical induction
Block
- Base case:
\begin{flalign*} LHS&=3\cdot5^0=3 \\[10pt] RHS&=\frac{3(5^{0+1}-1)}{4} \quad \\[10pt] &=\frac{3\cdot 4}{4}=3 \quad \\[10pt] & \rightarrow P(0) = \mathbf{T} \end{flalign*}Block
- Induction step: Assume
- That is:
- We need to prove:
- Which is:
\begin{flalign*} & 3 + 3 \cdot 5 + 3 \cdot 5^2 + \ldots + 3 \cdot 5^k + 3 \cdot 5^{k+1} \quad \\[8pt] &= \frac{3(5^{k+1}-1)}{4} + 3 \cdot 5^{k+1} \text{ (Inductive hypothesis)} \end{flalign*}Block
- We have:
\begin{flalign*} &\frac{3(5^{k+1}-1)}{4} + 3 \cdot 5^{k+1} \quad \\[5pt] = &\frac{3(5^{k+1}-1)+3\cdot 4\cdot 5^{k+1}}{4} \quad \\[5pt] = &\frac{3\cdot 5^{k+1}-3+3\cdot 4\cdot 5^{k+1}}{4} \quad \\[5pt] = &\frac{3\cdot 5^{k+1}(1+4)-3}{4} \quad \\[5pt] = &\frac{3\cdot 5^{k+1}\cdot 5-3}{4} \quad \\[5pt] = &\frac{3\cdot 5^{k+2}-3}{4} \quad \\[5pt] = &\frac{3(5^{k+2}-1)}{4} \quad \\[5pt] \end{flalign*}Block
- So
- By induction,
Work 3.
- (1) Prove the following propositions
Block
- Base case:
- We have:
- We have:
- Since: , therefore:
- Induction step: Assume
- That is:
- We need to prove:
- Which is:
\begin{flalign*} & 3^{k+1} < (k+1)! \quad \\[5pt] & \equiv 3 \cdot 3^k < (k+1)k! \quad \\[5pt] & \equiv 3^k < \frac{k+1}{3}k! \quad \\[5pt] & \text{For } k > 6 \mid k \in \mathbb{Z}: \quad \\[5pt] & k! < \frac{k+1}{3}k! \quad \\[5pt] & \text{From the inductive hypothesis,} \quad \\[5pt] & \text{We know that } 3^k < k! \text{ so:} \quad \\[5pt] & 3^k < \frac{k+1}{3}k!, k > 6 \mid k \in \mathbb{Z} \quad \end{flalign*}Block
- Therefore
- By induction,
- (2) Prove the following propositions
Block
- For :
Block
- For :
Block
- For :
Block
- For :
Block
- We found our base case of
- Induction step: Assume
- That is:
- We need to prove:
- Which is:
\begin{flalign*} & 2(k+1)+3 \leq 2^{k+1} \quad \\[5pt] & \equiv 2k+3+2 \leq 2\cdot 2^k \quad \\[5pt] & \equiv 2k+3 \leq 2\cdot 2^k-2 \quad \\[5pt] & \text{For } k > 3 \mid k \in \mathbb{Z}: \quad \\[5pt] & 2^k < 2\cdot 2^k -2 \quad \\[5pt] & \text{From the inductive hypothesis,} \quad \\[5pt] & \text{We know that } 2k+3 \leq 2^k \text{ so:} \quad \\[5pt] & 2k+3 < 2\cdot 2^k-2, k > 3 \mid k \in \mathbb{Z} \quad \end{flalign*}Block
- Therefore
- By induction,
- Therefore, the smallest value of positive integer for which is
- (3) Prove the following propositions
Block
- Base case:
- We have:
- Therefore:
- Induction step: Assume
- That is:
- We need to prove:
- Which is:
\begin{flalign*} & (k+1)^3+2(k+1)\quad \\[5pt] & = k^3+3k^2+3k+2k+3 \quad\\[5pt] & = (k^3+2k)+(3k^2+3k+3) \quad\\[5pt] & (3k^2+3k+3) \text{ trivially } \vdots \space 3 \quad \\[5pt] & \text{We know that } k^3 + 2k \space \vdots \space 3 \text{ so:} \quad \\[5pt] & (k^3+2k)+(3k^2+3k+3) \space \vdots \space 3, k \geq 1 \mid k \in \mathbb{Z}^+ \quad \\[5pt] & \text{Therefore } (k+1)^3+2(k+1) \space \vdots \space 3, k \geq 1 \mid k \in \mathbb{Z}^+ \end{flalign*}Block
- Therefore
- By induction,
Work 4.
- Prove the following proposition using mathematical induction:
Block
- Base case:
Block
- Therefore:
- Induction step: Assume
Block
- We need to prove:
Block
- Therefore
- By induction,
Work 5.
- Prove the following proposition using mathematical induction:
Block
- Base case:
- We have:
- Therefore:
- Induction step: Assume
- That is:
- We need to prove:
- Which is:
\begin{flalign*} & 2^{k+1} \geq (k+1)^2 \quad \\[5pt] & \equiv 2 \cdot 2^k \geq k^2+2k+1 \\[5pt] & \equiv 2^k \geq \frac{1}{2}k^2 + k + \frac{1}{2} \quad \\[5pt] & \text{For } k \geq 4 \mid k \in \mathbb{Z}: \quad \\[8pt] & k^2 \geq \frac{k^2}{2} + k + \frac{1}{2} \quad \\[8pt] & \equiv k^2 + 2k + 1 \geq 0 \quad \\[5pt] & \text{Which is True because RHS is an increasing} \quad \\[2pt] & \text{quadratic with global minima 0} \quad \\[5pt] & \text{From the inductive hypothesis,} \quad \\[5pt] & \text{We know that } 2^k \geq k^2 \text{ so:} \quad \\ & 2^k \geq \frac{1}{2}k^2 + k + \frac{1}{2}, \forall k \geq 4 \mid k \in \mathbb{Z} \quad \end{flalign*}Block

$$ k^2 + 2k + 1 $$
- Therefore
- By induction,
Work 7.
- Prove the following proposition:
Block
- First we define the proposition above as P(n).
- We will use De Morgan’s Laws and Induction:
Block
- Base case:
- By De Morgan’s Law:
- Induction step: Assume
- That is
- We need to prove:
- Which is:
- Consider:
Block
- Therefore
- By induction,
Work 9.
- Prove the followings:
Block
- (a) and (b): Similar to Work 7. using Distributive Laws and Induction.
- (c) is similar to (d), so I will demonstrate with (c).
Block
- First we define the proposition above as P(n).
- Base case: . Proof:
Block
- Induction step: Assume
- That is
- We need to prove:
- Which is:
Block
- Therefore
- By induction,
Work 11.
- Prove the following using mathematical induction:
Block
- This is similar to Work 7.
- is essentially
- are essentially
- We can solve this problem using De Morgan’s Laws and Induction.
Work 13.
- Prove the followings:
Block
Block
Block
Block
Block
Work 17.
- Prove the followings:
Block
- First we define the proposition above as P(n).
- Since (*)
- We need to prove:
- Base case:
- Inductive step: Assume
- We need to prove:
- We have
- By induction,
- Since and
- We conclude
- References and Extras:
- Work 17. Complement.
- Work 17. Complement.
- Work 9. Complement.
- Mary Radckiffe, Carnegie Mellon University - Induction
- David A. Cox, Catherine C. McGeoch, Amherst College - Logic, Sets, and Proofs
- Kenneth H. Rosen - Discrete Mathematics and Its Applications.